Search:
Solvers
Puzzles
Latest Apps
Str8ts
Other
 Page: 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 : 2008 2007 2006

# Feedback and Questions

I've received a lot of interesting comments and questions from Sudoku fans over the last few years and this page is where I try to answer them. Please feel free to drop me a note on the side of the page or try the Facebook comment box. Or you can email me directly at .

Part of the World you're from

Email Address (optional) so I can reply directly if necessary (it will not be displayed here)

Any Sudoku you want to publish here for easy loading into the solver - 81 characters, use '.' or '0' for unknowns.

 public - comment/question will be added to feedback column private - email comment/question directly to Andrew Stuart, don't display here

 Comment, question or feedback: Please enter theletters you see:
Many thanks to all the people who have helped improve the solvers and strategies with their feedback!

## ... by: Craig, USA

`+----------------+--------------+--------------+|    29   7    6 |   59  25   1 |    3  48  48 ||    13   8    4 |   36   7 369 |   19   2   5 ||   123  35 2359 |   23   4   8 |    7   6  19 |+----------------+--------------+--------------+|     5  13   38 |    7   6   2 |   89  14  49 ||     6  19    7 |   59   8   4 |    2  15   3 ||     4   2   89 |    1   3  59 |    6  58   7 |+----------------+--------------+--------------+|    28   6   35 |    4   9  35 |   18   7 128 ||  2378   4   23 |  236   1 367 |    5   9 268 ||   279  59    1 |    8  25 567 |    4   3  26 |+----------------+--------------+--------------+`

It doesn't find the x-wing in columns 3 & 4 on 2's?

Andrew Stuart writes (11-Oct-2009):

I stepped through to the position below. I don't see how you eliminated the 2 in G3 to make the x-wing. My next step would have removed

SINGLES CHAIN (Type 1): Removing 2 from H1

Making it beyond your board above

## ... by: Bob Kukla, Dallas Texas

I use your website everyday. It would be nice to have your program on my laptop for use without using the Internet. Do you sell it in that form?

Thanks.

Andrew Stuart writes (11-Oct-2009):

I did make a windows version but I couldn't finish it. Not to the standard I'd have liked. It is something I do want to finish when I have time

## ... by: PLH, New York

Hello,

Thanks for the great service you are providing us!! I tried your site for the first time a couple of days. Today being frustrated not seeing the XWing in this puzzle I entered the information (twice) and twice got an error after clicking on "next step". I cannot figure out what is creating this other than a bug.

Could you please check it out. Thank you.
Philippe

Andrew Stuart writes (11-Oct-2009):

Someone was hammering the server and it made that part stop. X-wings is the first strategy that calls this server side service. Its working for me at the moment

## ... by: donged, usa

Just want you to know how much I appreciate the incredible service you provide. Every time I reach a point of frustration, and am sure there is no solution to the puzzle, I go to this site and PRESTO - there it is. I would have stopped attempting the tough puzzles long ago, if not for you. THANK YOU.

Andrew Stuart writes (4-Oct-2009):

Thx!

## ... by: Florence, UK

I was just using your solver with the sudoku above and it suggested the next move was linked to "X-CYCLE on 5 (Discontinuous Alternating Nice Loop, length 10):
5[D1]-5[D2]=5[G2]-5[G4]=5[F4]-5[E5]=5[E7]-5[J7]=5[J1]-5[D1]-
- Discontinuity is two weak links joined at D1, 5 can be removed from that cell"
I am just learning about X-Cylcle's and wanted to check 2 things: a) do the links have to alternate between weak and strong and b) why isn't F4-E5 a strong link?
Thanks.

Andrew Stuart writes (19-Sep-2009):

String links can be weak links to allow the alternations - its just weak links which can't be strong

## ... by: JPAV, USA

Unless I'm missing something, this is a puzzle where the 'diabolical' XYZ Wing strategy can't be applied correctly, but the 'tough' Swordfish strategy can (which is the one your solver applies first). The XYZ strategy seems the easier to identify for me, so I'm used to applying it before Swordfish, but here it doesn't seem to work. I get to the wing represented by E2-F3-H2, which should allow me to remove 4 from D2. That creates 2 more wings for D1-D2-H1 and D1-D2-H2, the latter allowing me to remove 5 from E2. That leaves 5 as the solution for E8, which is wrong. Thus, it appears the Swordfish strategy must take precedence over the XYZ Wing strategy in this case. Am I doing something incorrectly?

Andrew Stuart writes (19-Sep-2009):

D1-D2-H1 and D1-D2-H2, the latter allowing me to remove 5 from E2

D1-D2-H1 is a valid XYZ-wing but you cant eliminate on E2 because E2 cannot see all three cells.

D1-D2-H2 is not a valid XYZ-wing because the hinge cell only contains 2 numbers.

Hope that helps

## ... by: TMH, USA

Two things: the sudoku I've entered above ("Diabolical" because it uses the "almost locked sets" strategy), and that you can add iCab to your "Tested on:" banner at the top. That is what I use and it works perfectly.

Andrew Stuart writes (19-Sep-2009):

Thanks TMH, I'll add that next update, good to know

## ... by: Dave Scott, US

This was a medium level puzzle generated at Road Runner, I believe listing you as the creator. It seems that recent puzzles have more frequently completely blocked solving by applying the three rules (no repeats in row, column, or square). And those weren't identified as particularly hard or fiendish. This forces more complicated strategies, such as the one in this puzzle that when the possibles are listed the nine toward the bottom of the puzzle is the only possible entry for that cell. The Solver goes on to display multiple changes at once and when rows and columns are simultaneously affected, sometimes as many as 6-7 cells solved at one time, it becomes very confusing to try to follow everything going on at once. Suggest perhaps changing the single step (or make it an option) so that only one cell is changed for any given step/cycle. An alternate would be to suggest changing only rows or columns at the same time, but not both, etc.
Thanks,
Dave

Andrew Stuart writes (10-Sep-2009):

Yep, I provide these puzzles, although someone else designed the player. Regards the solver, its is generally designed for diffcult puzzles. The multiple solutions you are experiencing in one step are easy singles which don't impact on each other. They are all in the same round because they can all be found at the same time. If I made this part step by step it would lengthen an already long process of stepping through. If I made it an option there's still the the quandrary of which ones to show first (the order would be top left to bottom right) but the human solver would be finding these singles all over the place. What I've done is a compromise over a lot of conditions :)

## ... by: mimi, Vienna, Austria

Hi Andrew,
why does the Trial-and-Error method not solve this Sudoku sent in by Geoffrey Howell, see Thursday 30-Jul-2009? I tested the Sudoku. A two-step trial is enough to solve it, so rather an easy one, well, relatively speaking.
br, mimi

Andrew Stuart writes (10-Sep-2009):

I don't have many trial and error strategies (well 2) so I can't solve this yet. I would *like* to solve it logically without guessing. Its useful to have these however, thanks for sending in

## ... by: EHK, USA

Solver no longer works beyond simple techniques. No longer free?

Andrew Stuart writes (10-Sep-2009):

If its not working the the service on the server has got gumbed up and I need to kick it. No plans for a paid access to the solver. Thanks for the offer though :)

I'll give it a restart