Solver App for Android
SudokuWiki.org
Strategies for Popular Number Puzzles
Search:
Page:2025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 :2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Feedback and Questions

I've received a lot of interesting comments and questions from Sudoku fans over the last few years and this page is where I try to answer them. I'm also directing Str8ts feedback here. Please feel free to drop me a note on the side of the page. Or you can email me directly at .


Post a Comment or Question here...
Your Name or 'Handle'

Part of the World you're from

Email Address (optional) so I can reply directly if necessary (it will not be displayed here)

Any Sudoku you want to publish here for easy loading into the solver - Either 81 numbers or the packed string version.

public - comment/question will be added to feedback column
private - email comment/question directly to Andrew Stuart, don't display here

Comment, question or feedback:

Enter these letters
Please enter the
letters you see:
arrow


If you are writing to alert me of a problem (thank-you!) please include a url to the page in question.
Can get fixes in quicker if I know immediately where to go.
Many thanks to all the people who have helped improve the solvers and strategies with their feedback!

Tuesday 9-Dec-2025

... by: Manfred, Vienna, Austria, Europe

Hi Andrew,
Your last update to the Sudoku Solver does the trick: Weekly Unsolvable #675 is no longer unsolvable :)

And: I can confirm Jacob's report (see below).
Please load Daily Level 3 from today (12.9.) and step through.
After setting last candidates 3 in D3 and E4, candidate 4 in D6 gets incorrectly highlighted. Candidate 3 for removal in D6 gets not highlighted.

Thanks again for your great work.

Andrew Stuart writes:
You are right! Yes using a + instead of an OR '|'. Fixed now ty

Okay so I made a mistake making this Weekly. I was searching for a suitable unsolvable by running the generator for a long time but it was a version of the program where I'd accidentally disabled the Forcing Chains. I did wonder at the time that I was finding unsolvables a bit too quickly but didn't connect. Anyway, still a crazy tough one.

Tuesday 9-Dec-2025

... by: numpl_npm, Japan

I would also like the "Hidden Singles" and "Pairs Naked + Hidden" options.
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| 3489 26 2346 | 4589 458 7 | 2389 56 1 |
| 189 7 16 | 1589 2 3 | 89 4 56 |
| 13489 12 5 | 6 148 489 | 7 28 2389 |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| 6 5 8 | 149 3 249 | 249 12 7 |
| 7 4 12 | 1589 158 6 | 289 3 2589 |
| 13 9 123 | 7 1458 2458 | 6 1258 2458 |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| 14 16 7 | 3 9 48 | 5 268 2468 |
| 5 8 46 | 2 7 1 | 34 9 346 |
| 2 3 9 | 458 6 458 | 1 7 48 |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+

If 5R2C9 then
+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
| 489 2 3 | 4589 458 7 | 89 6 1 |
| 89 7 6 | 189 2 3 | 89 4 5 |
| 489 1 5 | 6 48 489 | 7 28 2389 |
+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
| 6 5 8 | 149 3 249 | 249 12 7 |
| 7 4 12 | 1589 158 6 | 289 3 289 |
| 3 9 12 | 7 1458 2458 | 6 1258 248 |
+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
| 1 6 7 | 3 9 48 | 5 28 248 |
| 5 8 4 | 2 7 1 | 3 9 6 |
| 2 3 9 | 458 6 458 | 1 7 48 |
+--------------+-----------------+----------------+

Hidden Singles off & Pointing Pairs on -> 2R45C7 ( ... 2R4C7 )

( -2R4C8 -2R6C8 -2R5C9 -2R6C9 1R4C8
5R6C8 -5R6C6 -48R9C6 5R9C6 -5R9C4
[48]R9C9=[
4R9C9 8R9C4 4R7C6 8R6C9 |
8R9C9 4R9C4 8R7C6 4R6C9 ]
=2R6C6 -2R4C6 2R4C7 )

+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 489 2 3 | 4589 458 7 | 89 6 1 |
| 89 7 6 | 189 2 3 | 89 4 5 |
| 489 1 5 | 6 48 489 | 7 28 2389 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 6 5 8 | 149 3 249 | 249 1 7 |
| 7 4 12 | 1589 158 6 | 289 3 89 |
| 3 9 12 | 7 1458 248 | 6 5 48 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 1 6 7 | 3 9 48 | 5 28 248 |
| 5 8 4 | 2 7 1 | 3 9 6 |
| 2 3 9 | 48 6 5 | 1 7 48 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+

Hidden Singles on -> 4R4C7
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 489 2 3 | 4589 458 7 | 89 6 1 |
| 89 7 6 | 1 2 3 | 89 4 5 |
| 489 1 5 | 6 48 489 | 7 28 3 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 6 5 8 | 149 3 249 | 4 12 7 |
| 7 4 12 | 1589 158 6 | 289 3 289 |
| 3 9 12 | 7 1458 2458 | 6 5 248 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+
| 1 6 7 | 3 9 48 | 5 28 248 |
| 5 8 4 | 2 7 1 | 3 9 6 |
| 2 3 9 | 458 6 458 | 1 7 48 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------------+


Andrew Stuart writes:
I have added a checkbox for Pairs. Still not sure about Hidden Singles but you have shared some interesting situations where it would be useful?

Monday 8-Dec-2025

... by: Jacob, Netherlands

(Daily Sudoku 12.08.2025 Level 4) https://www.sudokuwiki.org/sudoku.htm?bd=...4789..2.7.6.............5.6..1..2.73...18.9..7..5.3.............5.4.1..5246...

After the update (2.49 --> 2.50) the solver sometimes incorrectly highlights in yellow the wrong numbers, that have been eliminated by the newly found hidden singles.

Btw, having the strategies "Pointing Pairs", "Box/Line Reduction" and "Triples Naked + Hidden" as optional is a nice addition! What stopped you from also making "Hidden Singles" and "Pairs Naked + Hidden" optional? :)

Andrew Stuart writes:
Are you sure? I’ve stepped through the puzzle very carefully and all the new highlights are from Naked Singles. Where Hidden Singles are found they are shown in green, then the next step is to turn them into solutions which triggers the highlight of those candidates to be cleared off in the step after. Ie they are now Naked Singles. Send me a picture if I’m wrong.
Update: Seen and fixed! Thanks.

I know from testing that certain mid and complex strategies require basic strategies to be cleared off, or may produce unexpected results. I think Pairs are fundamental and should be required first but relaxing the other ones. We’ll see if we get any reports of funny stuff.
Update: Added a checkbox for Pairs

Friday 5-Dec-2025

... by: 39_Chevy, USA

The Solver is still not working for the Jigsaw. When loaded into the Solver the numbers appear to be OK, but the grid changes.

Andrew Stuart writes:
I see the problem. Try now. Thanks for reporting

Friday 5-Dec-2025

... by: John, Texas

https://www.sudokuwiki.org/jigsaw.aspx?shape=16&bd=...3.2..47.8......3..64......5......6..2.4..5......3..1...2..........4.84..517...

For the past 2 nights, Dec. 4 & 5, 2025, the Jigsaw solver shows the given clues in the correct positions row & column, but the pattern in the Solver is different from the pattern in the Puzzle. If I solve a cell & check with the Solver, same problem, wrong pattern from the Puzzle yielding 0 Solution Count

Andrew Stuart writes:
True, thanks for detecting. Was a very recent change. Try now

Tuesday 2-Dec-2025

... by: Matt, DC, USA

This summer, a change was made to refuse to process any sudokus with less than 17 givens. This has made your tool significantly less helpful for variant sudokus, such as Thermos, Killers where some regions have no sums, or Just One sudokus where only one digit can be deduced with confidence.

Would you consider changing the 17 clue requirement from an error to a warning, and still let the existing logic do what it can?

Andrew Stuart writes:
I thinking about this. Need to do some testing. Quite possible

Tuesday 2-Dec-2025

... by: Leo, Germany

Playing on str8ts.com with my Android phone the browser annoyingly tries to select the text on the number-buttons when i use them.
Could be an easy fix, to disable text selection for the buttons via CSS:
.numberpad {
(...)
-webkit-user-select: none;
user-select: none;
}

Thank you for providing lots of free puzzles!
Greetings
Leo

Andrew Stuart writes:
Thanks for the tip Leo, I've applied the css. Check now

Sunday 30-Nov-2025

... by: Clive Snashall, UK

The new Killer entry system with the number selection is excellent!

Andrew Stuart writes:
Fantastic! Took a few goes but I think it's much slicker now

Thursday 20-Nov-2025

... by: Phillip, Little Rock, Arkansas

What a great site. I came just looking for new patterns for solving beyond what I had done for years, and I ended with a perennially open tab in my browser!

I'm truly impressed by the complexity of some of these solving methods, yet you have code to pull them off as well! I was in a long hiatus from Sudoku for many years, and then one day prompted an AI chat with a NYT sudoku I was stuck on... It UTTERLY failed to comprehend Sudoku at all. Tried, but failed. Then I fell in the rabbit hole: Can I write some front end to solve and create puzzles? How do you break down the steps we take in our heads and while solving? ...and so on. Not sure I came out on top of it all, but i did get somewhere: http://dice.phillipwildhirt.com/sudoku

Anyways, found your site and now the world has opened up! Just makes me want to start all over and try again! Thanks for your work!

Andrew Stuart writes:
Very kind words, thanks so much. Mostly I get bug reports (which I’m equally eager to get) but complements don’t have me hunting around code. Quite a slick UI you built there, well done. Enjoy!

Thursday 20-Nov-2025

... by: Jon, England

Hi / I’m not sure if it’s me, but I have noticed the following issue since using the new Version 2.47.1 of the suduko solver on my iPad :-

If you select a cell in the solver to edit the candidates (ie touch the cell on the iPad screen) and then realise it’s not the cell you wanted , you used to be able to immediately select another cell. With the new software if you select a second cell without hitting the return key first, it blanks (hides) the contents of the second cell selected.

You can make the cell candidates visible again by toggling the candidates shown tick box off and on, but it wont allow you to edit the candidates.

The only option I can find is to delete the ipad page and reload the solver from the daily page, thus losing all my edits in the solver.

I’ve tried removing the solver from memory and rebooting but to no avail.

Tested on 2 separate iPads.

Regards

Jon

Andrew Stuart writes:
My bad. I thought I’d tested it on iPads but I didn’t notice what it was doing when you clicked the second cell. Not too hard to fix, I’ve put an update out. If you refresh the solver page should be good
Let me know
Page:2025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 :2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Thank-you everyone for all your questions and contributions.