There are two ways one can group all the strategies for Sudoku: by difficulty and by family. Difficulty is rather subjective but necessary, for example, when selecting the order in which strategies are tried in the solver. Some strategies will always be easier for some people to spot than others, but I believe I have chosen an ordering which is not too controversial. So the main documentation has a side menu organised by difficulty. There is also an article on
Brute Force vs Logic.
With chaining strategies, there is definitely a theme going through them. This theme is all about bi-value (only two candidates left in the same cell) and bi-location (only two occurrences of a particular candidate left in the same unit) pairs and the incredible number of deductions one can make from them. You will find, if you read through this group, that earlier strategies become part of a more general theory as the theme develops. Thus, for example, Remote Pairs are a subset of XY-Chains; that is, XY-Chains is a more general approach of which Remote Pairs are a specific instance. Do read the introductory articles
Introducing Chains and Links and
Weak and Strong Links.
Exotic strategies do overlap with chaining ones, but they have a peculiar flavour of their own and some wonderful, if obscure, logic. They are definitely worth presenting as a demonstration of people's ingenuity but you will only need to have recourse to them on the extreme puzzles.
There are naturally special strategies for Jigsaw and Killers because of their differences. These are now included for the first time on this site.
This strategy list is by no means complete. Many strategies can be further extended and we do not have a complete theory of all Sudoku puzzles. If you are interested in the concepts behind creation and grading, there is a PDF document here called
Sudoku Creation and Grading. With the community's help I hope to extend the documentation here.
For those people wondering why "
Escargot" cannot be solved by the solver, there is an article on this special Sudoku
here. This is an early 'ultimate puzzle' but this crown has been usurped by the puzzle created by
Arto Inkala, which is also in the example list.
I'm pleased to include on this web site the
Sudoku Song (MP3 file) by Peter Levy (official
web site here). Peter wrote and recorded this song a couple of years ago and managed to capture the essence of the Sudoku craze to great acclaim.
Comments
Comments TalkTuesday 26-May-2020
... by: Pieter, Newtown, Oz
Hi AndrewNoticed a minor typo with a major effect in Eric's comment on Monday 27-May-2019 below.
...
Andrew Stuart writes:
Err, that has always been "this solver"
The link has a stray " in it which makes the link non-functional.
Ciao, Pieter
Sunday 24-May-2020
... by: Kim Uildriks
after all the obvious E2 = 9, F2 = 6, C1= 4Tuesday 1-Oct-2019
... by: Chucker
Has this solver been written in C++?If C# or C++, is the source code available?
Thanks!
Source code is propriety but I have orientated this site to programmers, there are enough information to code the strategies up. That's the fun part anyway.
Monday 27-May-2019
... by: Eric
Please can you give me the link to your original step-by-step sudoku solver site? That was the one that give the exact strategy used to solve each cell.Saturday 10-Dec-2016
... by: WW
What if you assumed the first candidate in the first unsolved cell was true? And now keep doing this(don`t eliminate as you go, I was thinking about blindly using trial and error) until you get a contradiction. The contradicting cell is now assumed to be the next candidate. If we run out of candidates in that cell to try, we change the cell before it to its next value. The idea was that by doing this we effectively search all possibilities(not really, but it doesn`t matter because if there is one contradiction the rest of the cell don`t matter) until we find the right one. But it might take a really long time. The worst-case scenario is that the correct combination is the last one, in which we have to sieve through n possibilities, where n is the product of the number of candidates in each unsolved cell. I am sure that it will work, but I want some confirmation.Wednesday 27-Jul-2016
... by: BLT
You need a search window for beginners to look for rules and etc. while using the Suduko Solver and others. I read the answers but was dumbfounded by Rule 2 as I couldn't find it to refer to. How can the rules be referred to while working a puzzle?All the results will highlight a strategy in the list to the right of the board. They are hyperlinked and should open in a new tab or window. There should be some documentation for everything returned by the solver so I'm interested to know where you were at this point
Wednesday 30-Sep-2015
... by: Jonathan
You did a very good job collecting all these awsome strategies and presenting them here on this site and this really also has been great help for me solving sudokus.But I was wondering why you do not cover the 2-String-Kite, Skyscraper or Turbot Fish strategy, which i found on many other sudoku forums, as I think that they are extremly usefull for solving sudoku puzzles.
Thursday 27-Nov-2014
... by: Brooks DeTuncq
I am curious about strategies that don't seem to involve any of the basic or even the complex strategies listed on any of the Sudoku sites I have checked. I have been using all of the basic strategies listed on this site because I got to a point where combining rows and columns to eliminate candidates was no longer enough to complete the puzzles. I have yet to attempt the more complex strategies. I can work through the "Fiendish" puzzles listed in my App in 30 to 90 minutes. My daughter, who hasn't played as long as I have, can do the same puzzles in 7-10 minutes without marking any cells and not using any of the the basic or even complex strategies. She is unable to explain to me how she just sees the answers. Do you have any ideas how this would be possible? Is there anything you know of that discusses this type of phenomena?Thursday 20-Jun-2013
... by: P Majumdar, Delhi, India.
I fully agree with the Comments from Mae (Thursday 9-Frb-2012.)All easy, medium and other low-difficulty level tough Sudoku puzzles cover only the very few basic simple strategies, whereas, tough/diabolic puzzles cover the remaining galaxy of advanced stategies. It is a pity!
The creator/s of all tough/diabolic Sudoku puzzles, should, provide some minimum hint, at least by naming the strategies involved towards solving the puzzle.
Saturday 23-Jun-2012
... by: jennifer antonio
coolThursday 9-Feb-2012
... by: Mae
The so called easy Sudoku puzzles on Road Runner have just gotten too hard to make them fun any more.Sometimes it is fun to just take a few minute break and work and easy Sudoku. How can you encourage people to begin playing Sudoku, if you make them this tough?
Wednesday 18-Jan-2012
... by: moses
I am making my own booklet on sudoku strategies may i use your samples from your book?Wednesday 10-Nov-2010
... by: Jonathan Carr-Hopkins
If, as Geoff in Australia offers, one cell can be only 3 or 5, then selecting one, and if that doesn't work, using the other, is this process, known as iteration, 'cheating', or is only a formulaic solution the only bona fide and acceptable one?Jonathan
Sunday 13-Jun-2010
... by: Geoff
I have been doing the Sudokus out of the local paper (Queensland Times, Australia) and they are rated from One Star to Five Star.I have just run across the first Five Star Sudoku where I am 3/4 finished but can not find any more hints.
Some of my friends tell me that you now need to start a 'trial & error' process ie if one cell can only be a 3 or a 5 - then pick on the 3 and see if it carries all the way through and if not, go back and pick on the 5.
I tend to think that there should always be a 'hint' to be found - is this correct?
Geoff
Tuesday 18-May-2010
... by: Lloyd Welton
Thanks for the great book. Never seen so many strategies so well explained in one book. Maybe in any following editions it should be spiral bound, that way it would a bit easier to use it as a reference.Thanks again.
Thursday 20-Aug-2009
... by: John C Raaen, Jr.
I blew it! The setup for a Virtual Wall is A1=1, A3=3, D2=4 and B4=4. Then A7, A9, C1, C2 and C3 are the "candidate squares for "4". Sorry!Wednesday 19-Aug-2009
... by: John C. Raaen, Jr
I see no examples of my concept of a wall or virtual wall. If boxes are A thru I and the squares are 1 thru 9, fill A1=1, A2=2, A3=3. This is a wall. Any number other than 1, 2 or 3 in box B or C, say B1=4. can be placed only on squares C1, C2 or C3, and on A7, A8 or A9. Usually some of those candidate squares are already occupied, often leading to an easy placement of, in this case, a "4". (Of course, the squares B and C, 1, 2 and 3 are excluded in the above.)In a virtual wall, use the same setup but leave A2 blank and put the "2" on D2=2. Again, the "4" can be placed only on squares C1, C2 or C3 and on A7, A8 and A9.
I am sure this simple technique is included somewhere on this site.