(a.k.a. Aligned ALS Exclusion)

This strategy is based on extending Aligned Pair Exclusion but uses Almost Locked Sets to make some clever reductions. From the components used it could be named Aligned ALS Exclusion but Mike Barker, who formulated it first in this thread, hit on "Death Blossom" because it starts with a cell designated as the "stem" which points to Almost Locked Sets, or the "petals", and is a great deal more flowery.

An**Almost Locked Set** is any group of N cells (that can all see each other) with N+1 candidates between them . This includes bi-value cells. A **Locked Set**, by contrast, contains exactly the right number of candidates for the group, examples of which are Naked Pairs and Triples.

This strategy is based on extending Aligned Pair Exclusion but uses Almost Locked Sets to make some clever reductions. From the components used it could be named Aligned ALS Exclusion but Mike Barker, who formulated it first in this thread, hit on "Death Blossom" because it starts with a cell designated as the "stem" which points to Almost Locked Sets, or the "petals", and is a great deal more flowery.

An

To get a feel for what’s going it worth working backwards from the elimination of 7 in C3 in this first example. We have two Almost Locked Sets {A3,E3,F3} and {C5,C6,C8} and they both have 7 as a common number between them. If C3 did have 7 as a solution it would reduce the first Almost Locked Set to a 5 on F3, 1 on E3 and lastly 3 on A3. The second ALS would reduce to a Naked Pair of 6/8 forcing C5 to be 1. If A3 is 3 and C5 is 1 then the stem cell (coloured green) A5 is left with nothing. This confirms that C3 is not 7.

Reversing direction will help illuminate the Death Blossom idea since we start with green “stem” cell. A5 with {1/3} must be able to see at least two ALSs which contain all its candidates. It is important that the 3 in A5 can see all of the 3’s in the yellow coloured ALS and the 1 in A5 can see all of the 1’s in the brown coloured ALS (one instance each in this case). But A5 overall does not have to see every single cell in all the ALSs, just the cells it shares candidates with.

Reversing direction will help illuminate the Death Blossom idea since we start with green “stem” cell. A5 with {1/3} must be able to see at least two ALSs which contain all its candidates. It is important that the 3 in A5 can see all of the 3’s in the yellow coloured ALS and the 1 in A5 can see all of the 1’s in the brown coloured ALS (one instance each in this case). But A5 overall does not have to see every single cell in all the ALSs, just the cells it shares candidates with.

Now, the two ALSs must have a candidate Z in common which the "stem" cell does not have. Because ALSs contain exactly one extra candidate for the number of cells they occupy (the N+1 candidates for N cells rule), we can assert that ANY cell that can see all the Zs in both ALS but is not part of those ALSs or the stem cell can be removed. Such a cell is C3.

Death Blossom was discovered by extending Aligned Pair Exclusion (APE) and asking if there was generalisation beyond the pairs and triples discussed in Aligned Pair Exclusion. With Almost Locked Sets there is. The stem cell A5 and the elimination cell C3 can’t see each other – they not aligned, but the pairs they can make do affect the board. In our example, consider the pairs that can be made between the 7 in C3 and the 1/3 in A5. These are 1/7 and 3/7 in C3 and A5 respectively. Both these turn out to be illegal since they would reduce our ALSs to having less candidates than cells. So whatever the solutions to the two disparate cells C3 and A5, C3 will never contain a 7.

Death Blossom was discovered by extending Aligned Pair Exclusion (APE) and asking if there was generalisation beyond the pairs and triples discussed in Aligned Pair Exclusion. With Almost Locked Sets there is. The stem cell A5 and the elimination cell C3 can’t see each other – they not aligned, but the pairs they can make do affect the board. In our example, consider the pairs that can be made between the 7 in C3 and the 1/3 in A5. These are 1/7 and 3/7 in C3 and A5 respectively. Both these turn out to be illegal since they would reduce our ALSs to having less candidates than cells. So whatever the solutions to the two disparate cells C3 and A5, C3 will never contain a 7.

In Figure 2 quite a different arrangement is apparent but the logic is identical. The two yellow coloured cells form a two-cell ALS with the values {3/5/7}. At the bottom there is a four-cell ALS with {2/3/6/8/9}. Our stem cell again contains only two candidates {6/7} (coloured green) but don't think this is a restriction. There could be five or six numbers in the stem cell. As long as there are sufficient Almost Locked Sets that the candidates can see then the pattern can be made to work.

There is another way to look at this example which mirrors some strategies already covered. Starting in G3

If G3 is 7 -> D3=5 -> D7=3 therefore D9,E9,F9,J7 <> 3

If G3 is 6 -> G8=9 -> G7=2 -> G9=8 -> J9=3 therefore D9,E9,F9,J7 <> 3

There is another way to look at this example which mirrors some strategies already covered. Starting in G3

If G3 is 7 -> D3=5 -> D7=3 therefore D9,E9,F9,J7 <> 3

If G3 is 6 -> G8=9 -> G7=2 -> G9=8 -> J9=3 therefore D9,E9,F9,J7 <> 3

Much of the first-sight complexity seems to evaporate when traced through in this manner.

Note: Example 2 cannot be found by the solver unless Digit, Cell and Unit Forcing Chains are turned off. I retain it as an example because it's the best one to show multiple eliminations. Indeed 4 eliminations is a pretty good hit. Unfortunately I can't find the orginal Sudoku to give a start position.

Note: Example 2 cannot be found by the solver unless Digit, Cell and Unit Forcing Chains are turned off. I retain it as an example because it's the best one to show multiple eliminations. Indeed 4 eliminations is a pretty good hit. Unfortunately I can't find the orginal Sudoku to give a start position.

Here is a fun one by Klaus: two massive ALSs in a DB puzzle in only 2 boxes.

Death Blossom

(ALS:{D3|E2|E3|F2|F3} and ALS:{E4|E5|E6|F4|F5}) + Stem:E1 means 7 can be removed from F1

Other fun examples Klaus Brenner has found include a Death Blossom with six eliminations and a Death Blossom with all its ALS in only one Box.

## Comments

Comments Talk## Wednesday 8-Dec-2021

## ... by: Anonymous

The link to the APE page seems to be broken## Monday 7-Jun-2021

## ... by: JONATHAN HANDOJO

This one took me quite a while to understand. I suppose my easier way of understanding this is more of "Cell Forcing". Because you would literally "force" all candidates on the stem cell to make up one complete locked set on at least one of the "petals". And when I explain about sudoku strategies to my friends, I like to refer potential eliminations as candidate X. So if I'm right, my way of understanding this is: "If forcing all values in the stem cell can create at least one locked set from each 'petal' (more specifically ALS), then X can be eliminated from any square that can see all instances of X from all ALS."I have yet to find one though, even though it's a nice logic and want to get one so badly... The best I've ever found is ALS, and whenever I use your solver, Aligned Pair Exclusion always picks it up first, haha.

## Sunday 26-Jan-2014

## ... by: Joe Bleau

Hi!You wrote :

“Klaus Brenner has found a Death Blossom with five eliminations”

If I’m right, there are 6 elimitaions.

Here are the 5 found by your program :

Death Blossom

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from B6

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from D4

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from D5

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from E4

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from G6

I think we can add this one :

([ALS:F6] and [ALS:E6|E7|E9]) + Stem:F7 means 4 can be removed from F4

I have a rule in the solver that says any elimination cell can't see the stem cell. But reviewing the example and definitions I am wondering if this is a necessary rule. Removing it I get your 6th. It will take some time to test for a negative as DBs are very rare, being at the end of the strategy list. But I'll give it a go

Edit: released a version with this rule relaxed, seems harmless to do so. Now finds six

## Monday 16-Apr-2012

## ... by: last1x {rus}

I've read some of your articles (in "extreme strategies" section mainly) …good analysis! Nevertheless I take a risk to suggest that all strategies (even the "baby" ones) are the "chains" and could be described by "backtracking" programming method. Imagine the cell with one possible candidate. If you try to chain it you'll have no success with that ;) Let this be 1-dimension chain (starts only with A). Go next: 2 candidates, => 2 dimensions (we can start a chain with A | B). And so on… Chains can be opened (XYZ Wing) or closed (Naked Pair). Anyway you can build your own chains to perform eliminations. Higher the dimension and larger the length of chain then more Brute-Force strategy resembles. But I like the name “Death Blossom” too ;)## Friday 30-Apr-2010

## ... by: Bud Nienhaus

I don"t see why these examples couldn't simply be called ALS-XY-wings, rather than death blossoms.## Friday 21-Aug-2009

## ... by: STRMCKR

Reversing direction will help illuminate the Death Blossom idea since we start with green “stem” cell. G8 with {3/5} must be able to see at least two ALSs which contain all its candidates. It is important that the 3 in G9THERE IS A TYPO in the first reference cell G8.

it should read G9.