Released 14th Oct 2023

This is the first novel 'tough' strategy in a long time and replaces Empty Rectangles which I feel is an overly complicated pattern.

Comments welcome.

I will use the original puzzle Ken sent to me to illustrate his pattern.

The pattern works on a single number - in this case 9.

The base of the pattern consists of a Hinge cell G2 connected to the one remaining 9 in the row (or column), in this case G6. This part has to be a strong either/or link. First 'wing' cell in orange.

From the hinge G2 we look for another 9 in the opposite orientation (the column) and in a different box that is weakly linked - more than two 9s in the unit. The second 'wing' cell.

Consider the weakly-linked A2. If it's ON, then the other wing cell G6 must also be ON. However, this would eliminate ALL the 9s in the 'fourth corner box' (box 2, which is the fourth corner of the rectangle). So A2 cannot be ON, i.e. we can eliminate 9 as a possibility from A2. Simple as.

So it turns out there is a second Rectangle Elimination at this stage of the puzzle and my solver finds it before Ken's one - just because of the way I search for the hinge first and go from top-left to bottom-right.

If the 9 in F2 was ON it would remove the 9 in G2 - AND - it would turn OFF the 9 in F4 and turn ON the 9 in J4 - eliminating the 9 in J1.

Since we can't remove all the 9s in box 7 we have a contradiction assuming 9 in F2 can be a solution.

The solver can identify more than one candidate in the same pattern as shown here. The results will be

If +1[B8] then -1[D8] forcing +1[D1] which removes all 1s from box 1, so B8 cannot be 1

If +2[B8] then -2[D8] forcing +2[D1] which removes all 2s from box 1, so B8 cannot be 2

If +1[B8] then -1[D8] forcing +1[D1] which removes all 1s from box 1, so B8 cannot be 1

If +2[B8] then -2[D8] forcing +2[D1] which removes all 2s from box 1, so B8 cannot be 2

To show how this is also an Empty Rectangle I've displayed the pattern here.

Grouped X-Cycle

1 taken off B8. ERI=B1 + strong link on 1 between D1 and D8.

2 taken off B8. ERI=B1 + strong link on 2 between D1 and D8.

And to show how these are often expressible as Nice Loops I show that pattern here

Grouped X-Cycle

X-CYCLE on 1 - Discontinuous Alternating Nice Loop, length 6):

+1[B8]-1[D8]+1[D1]-1[A1]+1[B2|B3]-1[B8]

- Contradiction: When B8 is set to 1 the chain implies it cannot be 1 - it can be removed

Another kind of double Rectangle Elimination is when both links are strong.

In this case the solver will return

If either +5[B7] or +5[E2] are ON then both are on because they are strongly linked through the hinge cell B2. If both are ON then this removes all 5s from box 6, so neither can be 5

This kind I find to be much, much rarer.

Note: The solver will always alternative strong/weak in a chain and draw the lines that way since it represents ON/OFF/ON etc. See here.

To give it's Nice Loop definition we have to use quite a complicated chain. It also works but discovering that B2 must be the solution rather than finding the wings are

X-CYCLE on 5 - Discontinuous Alternating Nice Loop, length 6):

-5[B2]+5[E2]-5[E7|E9]+5[F7]-5[B7]+5[B2]

- Contradiction: When 5 is removed from B2 the chain implies it must be 5 - other candidates 6 can be removed

This strategy is patched into the online solver - I have run tests to check my code and see how widespread it is. I have placed it between Y-Wings and Swordfish. On testing Ruuds top 50k test set I find 35,826 instances across 23,885 puzzles, so very high - but that is partly due to being at the front of the queue. I also found a small bug in the Empty Rectangles getting more instances, but that is moot now.

So here is an interesting situation unique to Jigsaws.

The fourth corner of this rectangle is C6 in the top-right most box. Before the solver would not find a Rectangle Elimination because it only searched for 2s in that box. The solver has now been updated to check all boxes since Jigsaws can go all over the place. I'm still looking for a 'box' that does not overlap with any of the other parts of the rectangle. The elimination is

The fourth corner of this rectangle is C6 in the top-right most box. Before the solver would not find a Rectangle Elimination because it only searched for 2s in that box. The solver has now been updated to check all boxes since Jigsaws can go all over the place. I'm still looking for a 'box' that does not overlap with any of the other parts of the rectangle. The elimination is

Rectangle EliminationLoad the puzzle

If +2[G6] then -2[G1] forcing

+2[C1] which removes all 2s

from box 8, so G6 cannot be 2

These puzzles have the most Rectangle Eliminations while still being less than or equal to diabolicals.

They make good practice puzzles.

They make good practice puzzles.

## Comments

## ... by: Pandu R

If so, it might be worth saying this explicitly. The current language and UI suggests that ER is a subset of RE.

## ... by: Pandu R

The base of the pattern consists of a Hinge cell G2 connected to the one remaining 9 in the row (or column), in this case G6. This part has to be a strong either/or link.

From the hinge G2 we look for another 9 in the opposite orientation (the column) and in a different box that is weakly linked - more than two 9s in the unit. *** (The 'hinge' cell is highlighted in green, and the 'wing' cells are highlighted in orange.)

Consider the weakly-linked 'wing' cell A2. If it's ON, then the other wing cell must also be ON. However, this would eliminate ALL the 9s in the 'fourth corner box' (box 2, which is the fourth corner of the rectangle). So A2 cannot be ON, i.e. we can eliminate 9 as a possibility from A2.

---

P.S.: I don't think the sentence "These two 'wing' cells (in orange) are locked. If one is ON the other must also be ON" is correct. (At least, if it's correct, it's not obvious, and might need more explanation.) Yes, if A2 is ON then G6 is on. But if G6 is ON, I don't see why A2 must be ON.

## ... by: tim

The Swami explains this useful and simple elimination in Clear, Simple to Understand language with Clear, Concise illustrations.

## ... by: Shari A Tuttle

## ... by: Shari A Tuttle

## ... by: Nephrium

## ... by: Pieter Newtown

David H's Comment made me look closer into this strategy. Frankly I skip many Tough strategies and often go straight to X-Cycles which will find this too.

The statement "These two 'wing' cells are

locked. If one is ON the other must also be ON" doesn't go both ways. If G6 is OFF then A2 is OFF is true, but in reverse, if G6 is ON then A2 is not necessarily ON due to the weak link from G2 to A2. If A2 is ON then G6 is ON would be true.Also, as David pointed out, a typo for us proper English spellers, should be "fourth corner box".

Ciao, Pieter

P.S.

I could never get my head around Empty Rectangles anyway!

## ... by: David Harkness

"From the hinge G2 we look for another 9 in the opposite orientation (the column) and in a different box that is weakly linked - more than two 9s in the unit."

So far, so good.

"These two 'wing' cells are locked."

Which are the two 'wing' cells? A2 and G2? A2 and G6? G2 and G6?

"If one is ON the other must also be ON."

This doesn't apply to any two cells of A2/G2/G6, so is the other wing cell in box 2? This is the part where you lost me.

"And if G6 is OFF then A2 is OFF."

Yes.

Our weakly-linked 'wing' cell 9 can be eliminated if ALL the 9s in the forth corner box are turned OFF by the action of A2 and G6."

I think that's a typo and you meant "fourth corner box" (box 2). This part is also clear. I'm just left wondering which two cells are the 'wing' cells which both must be ON if either is ON. Am I misreading that part?

Cheers,

David

## ... by: Strmckr

Empty rectangle intersection is the easier explination for empty rectangles as a mini row col switch in any box. Where all the values for the box exist on these two mini sectors.

Extensions include the

Dual ER (2 arms off 1 box)

rec`t kite (er+kite) 1 box connects to 2 arms which are also weakly linked in another sector.

Mutiple eri connected

Muti-fish for multiple digits

I have examples if you want

Ps we use aic logic over niceloops as these have been discontinued since 2010 as well as anything colouring based. As the logic of aic is shorter and easier in many aspects.

Strmckr