Solver App for Android
SudokuWiki.org
Strategies for Popular Number Puzzles
Search:
Page:2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 :1 2 3 :
2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Feedback and Questions

I've received a lot of interesting comments and questions from Sudoku fans over the last few years and this page is where I try to answer them. I'm also directing Str8ts feedback here. Please feel free to drop me a note on the side of the page. Or you can email me directly at .


Post a Comment or Question here...
Your Name or 'Handle'

Part of the World you're from

Email Address (optional) so I can reply directly if necessary (it will not be displayed here)

Any Sudoku you want to publish here for easy loading into the solver - Either 81 numbers or the packed string version.

public - comment/question will be added to feedback column
private - email comment/question directly to Andrew Stuart, don't display here

Comment, question or feedback:

Enter these letters
Please enter the
letters you see:
arrow


If you are writing to alert me of a problem (thank-you!) please include a url to the page in question.
Can get fixes in quicker if I know immediately where to go.
Many thanks to all the people who have helped improve the solvers and strategies with their feedback!

Friday 3-Nov-2017

... by: George, USA

Why doesn't your solver utilize multi chain coloring techniques? I see singles chaining and bivalue cell color chaining (3D Medusa). I'm new to Sudokus, and wondering if multicoloring is a poor technique, or if there are better techniques that take place of multicoloring? Thanks, you step by step sudoku solver with explanations, this has made learning the advanced techniques easy.

Andrew Stuart writes:
I'd have to see a good definition or specification for "multi-chain coloring" to assess it. Coloring overlaps with alternating interference chains a good deal, and may be the same thing to some people. I do have duel, triple and quad AICs all coded up and ready to be used at the end of the strategy list. Try some of the examples and tell me if that’s what you mean.

Sunday 29-Oct-2017

... by: Thom Mitchell, United States

I have enjoyed the Solver for several years:
(1) to check my answers for puzzles-without-solutions;
(2) help me improve my solving ability;
(3) nudge me forward when I get stuck with a particular puzzle; and
(4) check Solution Count.

Today I solved a puzzle, checked my solution and found my solution missing in Solver's Solution Count. This suggests an obvious question: Solution Count isn't necessarily exhaustive, correct?

Andrew Stuart writes:
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean " found my solution missing" ? That you solution didn't match the solution count? Were there more than one solution? There should only be one for a valid puzzle, I'm sure you know

Solution Count is perfectly and 100% exhaustive, I can assure you. For low numbers of clues it can take a long time (and time out since server resources are throttled) and for multiple solution, it will bail at 500 solutions, since more are uninteresting

Tuesday 10-Oct-2017

... by: Karthik Raj, India

Dear Stuart,
I have been using your ios app for quite sometime now. Due to IOS 12 upgrade, I am not able to use it. Can you upload a new version with 64 bit support for people who have purchased it earlier.

Regards
Karthik Raj

Andrew Stuart writes:
I'm pleased to let you know that the iPad '5 Daily Puzzles' upgrade is complete and released. This will work on iOS 9, 10 and up.

UK store link
US store link

If you still have the app on your device, it should automatically update

Thursday 4-May-2017

... by: Michel, Canada

There is a Killer Sudoku board I would like you to look at

Click on this link:
LINK

I am at my wit's (such as it is) end having spent far too much time on this one.
It comes from Stefan Heine Killer Sudoku Hardcore #4.
If you can suggest an approach or another site where I might be able to solicit assistance, I would very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Michel

Andrew Stuart writes:
Sorry for the late reply, been on a vacation.

Yes I don’t have enough strategies for very hard Killer, I'm at about 50% at the moment, compared to 1/10,000 normal Sudoku

Sorry It could not be solved, but love to know how it can be solved logically

Sunday 9-Apr-2017

... by: bob, california

once it put the pencilmarks in it worked..Good to see it up and running!

Tuesday 21-Mar-2017

... by: Gert, Netherland

Andrew,

I have a problem with your excellent Sudoku Solver. It occurs on all Sudoku's I try to solve.

Above the left small board I select "enter clues". Under the left small board, I have "auto tab" and "auto clear" checked.

Next, in the big board, I edit candidates in some square. E.g. I edit C3 from "1234" to "12". When I then go to the small board, and enter a value in some square, candidates in C3 automaticallly jump back from "12" to "1234".

I do not understand this. Am I doing something wrong? Is this an error in your program?

This does not seem to happen when I uncheck the "auto clear" field.

My understanding of the "auto clear" checkbox is that all impossiblle candidates are automaticallly removed after entering a solution or after a square is solved.

---

Furthermore, I do not understand what you mean by "Enter clues () or solutions ()". What is the difference?

Kind regards,

Gert de Korte, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Andrew Stuart writes:
The difference is that "restart" will clear off solutions. And the big number colour will be different

Friday 17-Mar-2017

... by: Doug, USA

Hi Andrew. Are there theoretical limits to how few numbers can be present initially to produce a unique solution? Are there algorithms for producing solvable sudokus, or is a trial and error approach necessary? More generally, has the game been thoroughly analyzed mathematically?

Thanks for your great site and for maintaining it over the years!

Andrew Stuart writes:
Good questions. 17 is the smallest but this has only been proven computationally not mathematically. There is a triangular relationship between making, solving and grading puzzles. Have you read this paper on the site?
http://www.sudokuwiki.org/Sudoku_Creation_and_Grading.pdf

Thursday 16-Mar-2017

... by: Robert Rozum, USA

Load Sudoku:

I have been solving Sudoku Puzzles for about six months and enjoying them very much. I came across this puzzle where you can use the wxyz technique. The explanations you provide to use this technique shows four examples. In the puzzle I sent you, examples 1 & 2 from your documentation, are combined creating 2 digits as the "non-restricted common digit." This allows the elimination of 2 digits as apposed to only one digit shown in your explanations. I don't know if this is common but it deviated from your explanations and I thought you might be interested in this modification. In addition, this wxyz technique is not needed to solve this puzzle.

Andrew Stuart writes:
Did you have some strategies unticked? Because this only needed Naked Pairs and Naked Triples

Wednesday 15-Mar-2017

... by: John, PNW in USA

Thank you for you online tutelage over these last 12 years. In 2005 I was diagnosed and treated for a year to clear up some nasty cancer.

I took that year to learn Sudoku because logic is not a strength of mine...it helped sort many things out for me.

I took off a few years from the puzzles as I returned to work and prepared for a fun redirection after 37 teaching elementary students.

Now I come back and am grateful that when I get stuck on a puzzle your site will be there to help me...on so many levels & Sudoku puzzle styles.

Andrew Stuart writes:
Glad you are better!

Tuesday 28-Feb-2017

... by: Serge, France

Hello, many thanks for your sudoku site, solver and methodology which are so well done and instructive.
I have learnt a lot with them.
I have faced a problem since some weeks as the board which retrieves solutions was changed so that the grid 9/9 has become 5/10. Therefore, it is impossible to read the solutions proposed by the solver so far.
Thank you very much for your help.
Serge

Page:2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 :1 2 3 :
2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Thank-you everyone for all your questions and contributions.