

Extended Unique Rectangles
Unique Rectangles can be larger structures than simple 2 by 2. In this extension I show how the solver can now detect 2 by 3. Just as a Naked Pair or Hidden Pair can be extended to a Triple, so can the cells that form Unique Rectangles.
A Triple is any three cells with a total of three candidates left. That doesn't always mean [1,2,3] + [1,2,3] + [1,2,3] Which is exactly three candidates in three cells. Other Triples will have some digits missing, like [1,2,3] + [1,2,3] + [2,3] [1,2] + [1,2,3] + [1,2,3] [1,2,3] + [1,2] + [2,3] And the ultimate skinny triple will have two out of three in each cell: [1,2] + [1,3] + [2,3] But all of these have  in total  three candidates in three cells.
Now, 2 by 3 is a bit of an odd shape. Other extensions, like XWing to Swordfish jump from 2 by 2 (four cells) to 3 by 3 (nine cells). We don't need to search for a ninecell 3 by 3 although they do theoretically exist. Take a look at the diagram to the right. In the left hand side marked A I've drawn the full 3 by 3 Deadly Rectangle.
Note: it must occupy exactly three rows, three columns and three boxes.
To the right labelled B I've marked out a candidate distribution of 1s, 4s and 8s. For each row and each column you'll see a Triple. If we've arrived at this state we're in trouble because there are many ways to settle those cells in all combinations of 1, 4 and 8. The only thing that saves us are the extra candidates marked in green.

Extended Deadly Pattern 
Here's how we go from the 3 by 3 ideal pattern to the much more likely 2 by 3 version: Take away any one of the columns with numbers and you still have a multiple solution problem. For example, if we took away column 8 (and ignored the green extra candidates for a moment), we could still fill column 7 with 1 + 8 + 4 (going down the rows), 4 + 1 + 8 and 4 + 8 + 1. Same for column 9. We could fill it with 4 + 1 + 8 or 4 + 8 + 1 or 8 + 4 + 1. If you take any column away it looks like the problem stays a problem. So conclusion  don't worry about looking for 3 by 3 Deadly Patterns  they will come out in the wash when you find 2 by 3.
In this first example we have an Extended Deadly Pattern based on the three candidates {1,3,5}. The yellow cells mark the pattern. Notice this pattern is vertical like the theory example above  but as we are not looking for (and don't have) a 3 by 3, we need to look out for the pattern working horizontally as well. One of these is below.
The only type of UR I've implemented in the solver, so far, is Unique Rectangle Type 1.
This says that the odd cell out  the cell with an extra candidate or two  is the key. Those extra candidates must be part of the solution. If they didn't exist we've have a full Deadly Pattern and we need to avoid that at all costs. So 6 in C1 is the extra candidate  it must be the solution, so we can remove 1 and 5 from C1 and progress.

Example Extended UR: Load Example or : From the Start 
Here is a similar Extended Unique Rectangle based on the cells AEH78 (which just means cells on rows A, E and H and columns 7 and 8). The Triple is {4,7,9} and we have 1 and 6  on cell E8. That's the getoutof jail card avoiding the bigger Deadly Pattern. Take away the 4 and 7 from E8 and we're back into single solution territory.

Example Extended UR 2: Load Example or : From the Start 
Finally a horizontal example.
The Triple {3,7,8} sits over the two rows D and E. There is a mixture of bivalue and trivalue cells but we clearly have two triples with the same values very close to each other. We have to use the extra candidates provided. There is a lone 1 in D2 that gets us out of trouble.

Example Extended UR 3: Load Example or : From the Start 
I will admit, instances of the Extended Unique Rectangle are not common, but if you are just getting into Unique Rectangle you'll be looking for the very common Type 1. I think it's worth keeping an eye out for this formation at the same time. You will notice a similar cluster of common candidates and it's just possible  if you remember the three boxes spread rule  that you'll find one when you're looking for the 2 by 2 version.


