Thursday 6-May-2010
... by: Trev
If you had a swordfish with a single cell in it's row (i.e. X-X-1), wouldn't that single cell be a hidden single and therefore you wouldn't need to use the swordfish strategy?Awesome site by the way!
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Print Version | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sword-Fish Strategy
Comments...Thursday 6-May-2010... by: TrevIf you had a swordfish with a single cell in it's row (i.e. X-X-1), wouldn't that single cell be a hidden single and therefore you wouldn't need to use the swordfish strategy?Awesome site by the way! Thursday 25-Feb-2010... by: CS VIDYASAGARAn excellent exposition of really advanced and difficult techniqe which many find it difficult to understand. You explained in simple and easily conprehendible manner. Thanks. Now I am confident of solving extremely difficult Sudoku puzzles using sword fish technique.Thursday 9-Apr-2009... by: jefA Swordfish is not limited to rows and columns, also boxes can be involved:Swordfish row 1, box[2,2] and row 9. Is your solver finding this pattern? Have you examples of this pattern? Kind regards, Jef PS I totally agree with your remarks on J.F. Crook's paper, nothing new and not a real solution. http://users.telenet.be/vandenberghe.jef/sudoku/ Add your comments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||