Solver App for Android and iPhone
Strategies for Number Puzzles of all kinds
Page Index
Solvers
Puzzles
Basic Strategies
Tough Strategies
Diabolical Strategies
Extreme Strategies
Depreciated Strategies
Str8ts
Other
The Logic of Sudoku Order Str8ts Book 1
Order Now! Order Str8ts Book 2
Order Now!

X-Wing Strategy

This strategy is looking at single numbers in rows and columns. It should be easier to spot in a game as we can concentrate on just one number at a time.

X-Wing example 1
X-Wing example 1 : Load Example or : From the Start
The picture on the right shows a classic X-Wing, this example being based on the number seven. The X is formed from the diagonal correspondence of squares marked A, B, C and D. What's special about them?

Well, A and B are a locked pair of 7's. So is C and D. They are locked because they are the only 7's in rows B and F. We know therefore that if A turns out to be a 7 then B cannot be a 7, and vice versa. Likewise if C turns out to be a 7 then D cannot be, and vice versa.

What is interesting is the 7's present elsewhere in the fourth and eighth columns. These have been highlighted with green boxes.
Think about the example this way. A, B, C and D form a rectangle. If A turns out to be a 7 then it rules out a 7 at C as well as B. Because A and CD are 'locked' then D must be a 7 if A is. Or vice versa. So a 7 MUST be present at AD or BC. If this is the case then any other 7's along the edge of our rectangle are redundant. We can remove the 7's marked in the green squares.

The rule is
When there are
  • only two possible cells for a value in each of two different rows,
  • and these candidates lie also in the same columns,
  • then all other candidates for this value in the columns can be eliminated.

The reverse is also true for 2 columns with 2 common rows. Since this strategy works in the other direction as well, we will look at an example next.

X-Wing example 2
X-Wing example 2 : Load Example or : From the Start

In this second example I've chosen a Sudoku puzzle where an enormous number of candidates can be removed using two X-Wings. The first is a '2-Wing'. The yellow high lighted cells show the X-Wing formation. Note that the orientation is in the columns this time, as opposed to rows as above. Looking at columns we can see that candidate 2 only occurs twice - in the yellow cells. Which ever way the 2s could be placed (E5/J8 or E8/J5) six other 2s in the rows can be removed - the green highlighted cells.
X-Wing example 3
X-Wing example 3
A few steps later the second X-Wing is found on candidate 3 in the same rows. Whichever way round the 3 can be placed in those rows (E2/J8 or E8/J2) there can be no other 3 in rows E and J except in those yellow cells.

Generalising X-Wing

X-Wing is not restricted to rows and columns. We can also extend the idea to boxes as well.
If we generalise the rule above we get:

When there are
  • only 2 candidates for a value, in each of 2 different units of the same kind,

  • and these candidates lie also on 2 other units of the same kind,

then all other candidates for that value can be eliminated from the latter two units.


Now we have 6 combinations:

  1. Starting from 2 rows and eliminating in 2 columns
  2. Starting from 2 columns and eliminating in 2 rows
  3. Starting from 2 boxes and eliminating in 2 rows
  4. Starting from 2 boxes and eliminating in 2 columns
  5. Starting from 2 rows and eliminating in 2 boxes
  6. Starting from 2 columns and eliminating in 2 boxes



Here is an example of combination 5. Starting from 2 rows and eliminating in 2 boxes, in this case the last two boxes in the Sudoku. The rows are 7 and 8 and they each have two 7s. Our x-Wing is now a trapezoid but the logic is the same. We can be certain that 7 can be eliminated at X, Y and Z

X-Wing Example

But HOLD UP one moment. There is a simpler strategy that does the same job!

X-Wing Example

A and B above are a pointing pair. This removes the same 7s in the same place. Combination 6 is also the complement of a pointing pair. Combinations 3 and 4 are also complements of the Line/Box Reduction. Our generalisation of X-Wing to boxes hasn't profited us at all. We learn that

X-Wings containing boxes are the inverse of the Intersection Removal strategies




Comments

Your Name/Handle

Email Address - required for confirmation (it will not be displayed here)

Your comment or question

Please enter the
letters you see:
arrow
Enter these letters Remember me


Please keep your comments relevant to this article.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Talk Subject Comments
Comments here pertain to corrections to the text, not the subject itself

Wednesday 9-Jan-2013

... by: sollaw

The initial x-wing solutio'n refers us to columns 2 and 6; in fact it should be column 4 and 8. This error was noted by Rich in his Dec. 8, 1213 note, and remains uncorrected.
Andrew Stuart writes:

Fixed

Tuesday 25-Dec-2012

... by: Warren Hudson

In the X wing strategy last sentence before the second example, there are the words, "we'll looks"...

I hate tipos, msspelings, grimattical eros and such, but I still loves your website.

And A Merry Christmas to you.
Andrew Stuart writes:

Fixed. Thank you

Saturday 8-Dec-2012

... by: rich

X-wing strategy, 3rd paragraph. Should say fourth and eighth columns, not second and sixth, I think. Great writeups.
Andrew Stuart writes:

Fixed. ty

Saturday 8-Aug-2009

... by: Kim Sidey

Andrew,

The margin of the left column in the first figure contains numbers. You likely meant to use alphanumerics (A-I).

Great web page. You've helped me tremendously!

-Kim
Andrew Stuart writes:

Yes, thats an old snap shot. needs to be redone

Article created on 10-April-2008. Views: 395816
This page was last modified on 14-March-2012.
All text is copyright and for personal use only but may be reproduced with the permission of the author.
Copyright Andrew Stuart @ Syndicated Puzzles Inc, 2012