This is an excellent candidate eliminator. The name derives from the fact that it looks like an X-Wing - but with three corners, not four. The forth corner is where the candidate can be removed but it leads us to much more as we'll see in a minute.

Lets look at Figure 1 for the theory.

A, B and C are three different candidate numbers in a rectangular formation. Three of the corners have two candidates AC, AB and BC. The cell marked AB is the key. If the solution to that cell turns out to be A then C will definitely occur in the lower left corner.If AB turns out to be B then C is certain to occur in the top right corner. C is a*complementary* pair.

Lets look at Figure 1 for the theory.

A, B and C are three different candidate numbers in a rectangular formation. Three of the corners have two candidates AC, AB and BC. The cell marked AB is the key. If the solution to that cell turns out to be A then C will definitely occur in the lower left corner.If AB turns out to be B then C is certain to occur in the top right corner. C is a

So whatever happens, C is certain in one of those two cells marked C. The red C can be 'seen' by both Cs - the cell is a confluence of both BC and AC.

It's impossible for a C to live there and it can be removed.

In Figure 2 I'm demonstrating the sphere of influence two example cells have, marked red and blue. X can 'see' all the red cells, Z can 'see' all the blue ones. In this case there are two cells which overlap and these are 'seen' by both.

It's impossible for a C to live there and it can be removed.

In Figure 2 I'm demonstrating the sphere of influence two example cells have, marked red and blue. X can 'see' all the red cells, Z can 'see' all the blue ones. In this case there are two cells which overlap and these are 'seen' by both.

If our A, B and C are aligned more closely they can 'see' a great deal more cells than just the corner of the rectangle they make. In Figure 3 BC can see AB because they share the same box. AC can see AB because they share the same row. BC and AC can see all the cells marked with a red C where this Y-Wing can eliminate whatever number C is.

I have found a superb 'tough' Sudoku puzzle with a sequence of five Y-Wings and this illustrates the full range of this strategy. The first three are pictured here but you can load the puzzle into the solver to see the remaining examples.

The first Y-Wing finds the AB cell in A2 which links 8 with the pair on B3 and the 3 in J2. Common to both the*pincer* cells is 4 which must go in either B3 or J2 so 4 in H3 can be removed.

The first Y-Wing finds the AB cell in A2 which links 8 with the pair on B3 and the 3 in J2. Common to both the

The second Y-Wing gets two candidates because of the alignment in column 1. The 8s in B1 and C1 can both see the cells A2 and G1 which also contain 8. These *pincer* cells are linked to the pair [4,3] in J2.

The third step is included because it shows a very neat rectangular alignment which almost mirrors the theory diagram. You couldn't ask for a clearer example. 4 must go in B1 or D6 otherwise 7 and 8 would be used up and there'd be nothing to go in B6. The 4 in D1 is the lone candidate that can see the yellow cells and should be removed.

They also require one Naked Pair.

They make good practice puzzles.

## Comments

Comments Talk## Friday 16-Oct-2015

## ... by: Yoshihiro Sato

Your web page is very interesting to me.I am learning Y-Wing strategy from this page.

In Y-Wing Example 3, I find two Y-Wing candidates.

In address of { {B, 6}, {B, 1},{D, 6} }, Y-Wing is { {3, 4}, {3, 8}, {4, 8} }, then 4 in {D, 1} shoud be removed. This is shown in your figure.

In address of { {H, 4}, {H, 3}, {F, 4} }, Y-Wing is { {3, 4}, {3, 8}, {4, 8} }, then 8 in {F,3} shoud be removed. Is this correct or wrong ?

Best regards, Y.Sato

## Sunday 25-Jan-2015

## ... by: zoph

I was hoping to use your Y-wing exemplar 4 for practice in recognizing Y-wings. I was disappointed to find I could solve entire puzzle using only your "getting started" simple strategies.I presume Exemplar 4 is the hardest of the four exemplars, owing to it highest score of 179.

## Thursday 11-Dec-2014

## ... by: Cotswold Mike

Many thanks for your lucid description of Y_Wing. At last I believe I understand it. My home grown program (written in Ada) now recognizes a Y_Wing and exploits it. There are a couple of "false Y_Wing" situations to be ironed and I am reasonably confident that they can be cracked.## Wednesday 7-May-2014

## ... by: georgemiller

in example one above, why can't cell J2 be the AB cell with cells A2 and B3 functioning as the BC and AC cells of the Y wing? If so, then all the eights could be eliminated in Box oneexcept of course the eights in cell A2 and A3.

## Wednesday 12-Mar-2014

## ... by: Jon

Great explanation of the Y-Wing. Even a novice dummy like me could grasp it. But,,,, possibly by accident,,,, when I printed it,,,,,, from the start,,,, I only needed one y-wing to solve it,,, not 5... Once I went through all the "easier" steps,, I got to the y-wing you show in Example 1 and went on to solve it with no other y-wings... Did I get lucky and make a mistake along the way??And there are many minor variations on the solving path you can take, so yes, your solution might only get the one, depending on what you did and how much intuition you used.

## Saturday 24-Aug-2013

## ... by: ralph maier

@ DANOAs for your ex if you think in terms ABC it is obvious that the 6 will be the C cell not 9 so you can eliminate the 6S that see the 2 cells containing the 6s

## Monday 8-Apr-2013

## ... by: dano

I came across a pattern that is similar to what you list. The alignment of the pattern was68 - 89 aligned in a row (h1 - h7)

89 - 69 aligned in the same box (h7 - I8)

If this is a y-wing then the complementary pair are the 9's.

Is this a valid y wing and if so can you eliminate all the other 9's from the box that contains the 89-69 complementary pair?

## Friday 28-Dec-2012

## ... by: S. Lee

While testing my own solving algorithm with your fascinating 5-fold Y-wing example, I was surprised since my solver just required 2-fold exploitation of Y-wing strategy as follows:Step #23 : Y-Wing (<--- This coincides with your first Y-wing step)

{3,8}[A2] hinges {4,8}[B3] and {3,4}[J2]

-> 4 taken from H3

Step #24 : Y-Wing

{3,8}[H3] hinges {4,8}[H7] and {3,4}[J2]

-> 4 taken from J7

-> 4 taken from J8

This is the only step that the puzzle required except for Naked Single, Hidden Single and Intersection Lock (=Pointing Pair + Box/Line Reduction).

It is an interesting phenomenon for me that the total number of advanced strategies is largely affected by the way how we realize the strategy into algorithm.

## Wednesday 21-Nov-2012

## ... by: Mike Kerstetter

I understand the Y-wing concept thanks to your excellent explanation. My problem is seeing/finding them in the puzzle. The don't "stand out" for me. Are there any insights you can offer that might help me recognize that a Y-wing might be lurking around and how to track it down?## Tuesday 16-Oct-2012

## ... by: SpearheadJams

I am impressed by the work that you have done on this site. Much respect to you and your team. At the end of the day perfection is simple/elegant...## Monday 1-Oct-2012

## ... by: Dino Hsu

Hi Andrew and all,There's a small mistake about Y-wing in the logic of proof:

I'd like to use the Y-Wing Fig. 1 to explain this.

I will use coordinates for the cells:

Cell B2 with AB (bi-value), the pivot, which connects (sees) B5 and E2

Cell B5 with BC (bi-value)

Cell E2 with AC (bi-value)

Cell E5, the target cell to eliminate C, if any, which "sees" both B5 and E2

The definition of "see" is "two cells within the same element (row, column, box)" (the two cells see each other)

The statement "So whatever happens, C is certain in one of those two cells marked C.", which implies C in one of the two cells, actually C can also be in both cells.

Note that: the two B's in cells B2 & B5 are not a "locked pair", in other words, there could be other B's in row B. Similarly, the two A's in cells B2 & E2 are not a "locked pair" either, there could be other A's in column 2. As a result, (B5, E2) could be (C, non-C), (non-C), or (C, C), and in all scenarios, C should be eliminated from cell E5.

I find this mistake (saying the above A, B should be "locked pairs") in the book "Extreme Sudoku for Dummies" by Andrew Heron & Andrew Stuart, so I check here, I hope this helps the discussion to go clear.

Thanks for your attention.

If B2 contains A then E2 does not contain A - and being a bi-value cell, it will be C

If B2 contains B then B5 does not contain B - and being a bi-value cell, it will be C

The Y-Wing strategy tells us nothing about the ultimate solution of B2, B5 or E2 (it is not designed to) - and yes it is possible for C to be in both B5 and E2 - which just goes to reinforce the idea that E5 can't be C!

## Tuesday 28-Jun-2011

## ... by: Hans

Hallo Andrew,Thanks for excellent explaining - although I got an other question.

y-wing explanations, figure 5, left side:

between green marked cells 18 and 15 there is the cell 12578 which contains also an 8. Why is this 8 not deleted?

## Sunday 17-Apr-2011

## ... by: senselocke

Thank you so much for the write-up, and the site as a whole.Doing the step-by-step solving, with explicit reasons and links to the techniques, is exactly what I needed to be a better puzzler. Thank you so much!

## Tuesday 26-Oct-2010

## ... by: nihal

really good example. fantastic site.## Friday 17-Sep-2010

## ... by: Helen

Am I correct in assuming that finding a y-wing does not mean that the three cells forming the y-wing necessarily have to have those three numbers in the solution. It is only an eliminating strategy/## Thursday 10-Jun-2010

## ... by: Reggie

With the techniques in your "Logic of Sudoku" book, I am only able to solve up to level 5 in Dr. Arto Inkala AI Escargot book. Level 6 to 10 make me feel like I know nothing about sudokuDo you have another more advanced book? Where in the world can I learn strategies that will let me crack those Arto Inkala puzzles?

## Friday 26-Feb-2010

## ... by: Vidyasagar

I have not seen such lucid explanation of XY wing as you have done. The reasoing given by you makes one understand this difficult concept.thanks

## Saturday 30-Jan-2010

## ... by: Ed Wieder

The Y-Wing explaination is very good. It can be improved on by being consistent in numbering examples and figures. It might also be mentioned that the Y-Wing can only be used when one of the canidates is not in the same 3X3 box where the other two are located.## Tuesday 12-Jan-2010

## ... by: Jody

The image of the pincer really brought the Y-wing concept into focus.## Monday 11-Jan-2010

## ... by: William Balzar

Just learned the "Y-Wing" from your site.... WOW how elegant!!! I am like blown away. I will soon order that book. The best part of all of this is that there is still more to learn!!!! Like in that "Wayne's World" Movie: I am not worthy!!!Bill (NOT over the hill and just 5 months from 65)

THANKS

## Saturday 2-Jan-2010

## ... by: John

Nice work! I now can understand the Y-wing concept. Thanks for taking the time to teach those of us with lesser skills.## Tuesday 29-Dec-2009

## ... by: John Myfrianthousis

Brilliant! I am a medium-advanced player who often falls after a specific point. I believe now = especially with y-wing one I will recognize this formation## Thursday 17-Dec-2009

## ... by: ChandaMija

I call this a Crooked L-Wing. But I now get this. Thank you!## Tuesday 7-Jul-2009

## ... by: Malikov

Easy to understand concept.